You are viewing rollick

entries friends calendar profile The Dissolve Previous Previous Next Next
profile
Consistency is my hobgoblin
User: rollick
Name: Consistency is my hobgoblin
Website: The Dissolve
calendar
Back October 2013
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031
links
Not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be - Cooks Source crams the other foot in there, still doesn't get it
rollick
rollick
Share
Cooks Source crams the other foot in there, still doesn't get it
I'd more or less stopped paying attention to the Cooks Source thing; nihilistic_kid declared victory and walked away, the entire Internet seemed to know that it was a publication based on plagiarism. The site posted a sort-of-kind-of squirmy apology filled with accusations and blame-spreading and defiance and petulance, but it paid the requested donation and said there would be policy changes. (That statement is no longer on the site; I captured the whole thing here for those who want to read it.)

There's a new note up at the site now. (Thanks to farklebarkle for alerting me; I hadn't checked in since my last post.) And it's even more crazed than the last one. It's a badly spelled, badly punctuated, semi-coherent, self-aggrandizing, angry ramble that essentially blames original theft-victim illadore at length, and says that Cooks Source is probably doomed: "We have never been a great money-maker even with all the good we do for businesses. Having a black mark wont help… and now, our black mark will become our shroud. Winters are bleak in Western New England, and as such they are bleak for Cooks Source as well."

As before, I captured the entire statement here, warts and typos and all, because I'm not sure how long it will remain online:


Its sad really. The problem is that I have been so overworked and stretched that when this woman -- Monica -- contacted me, I was on deadline and traveling at the rate of 200 mile a day for that week (over 900 in total for that week), which I actually told her, along with a few other "nice" things, which she hasnt written about.
I was stupid to even answer her that night, her email to me was antagonistic and just plain rude and I was exhausted. But I got suckered in and responded. She doesnt say that she was rude, she doesnt say that I agreed (and did) to pay her. It was my plan to contact her after deadline and have a good discussion about it. The complicating issue was that one of the businesses we worked with had closed without notice, just a sign on the door -- leaving several people, including a chef who had relocated to this area from Florida -- out of work. I do not offer this as an excuse, but that, when she wanted money for Columbia University, it seemed ironic because there were all these people in this small town going into the holidays with no jobs, and no, well, nothing.

I should add that this email exchange took place the day before she wrote her article for the world. After she (likely) received my email, she called the home office phone at 10PM, I didnt answer that late, was in bed as I was traveling again the next day (left at 7AM the next morning) to Connecticut, and didnt get back to her. This is not an uncommon practice with anyone, to not respond to a phone call for a day or two, it happens to me from other businesses, all the time. I came home that day from being in Connecticut to find hundreds of phone messages and emails telling me I sucked and was a dirtbag... and much MUCH worse.

I really wish she had given me a chance to respond to her before blasting me. She really never gave me a chance.

Since then, we have had so much hate email (over 400 pieces) , phone calls and regular mail. My advertisers too, have been so harassed that it has all muddies up the waters as to what the real situation is. I took the site downbecuase someone threatened to go to all the distribution spots and destroy the new issue, also to protect my advertisers.
Facebook has not responded at all; not taken these advertisers name off this bogus site -- or remove the site completely -- and takes no responsibility that someone unnamed can just create a page that can suggest that people -- and I am sure that in real walking-around reality you are all really nice people -- that people should email total innocent strangers and harass them to death. Honestly, some of you have been pretty mean. I have been busy for the last week, apologising to these business owners and helping them to get things right again. If my apology to Monica seemed shallow it was because I was angry about the harm she has inflicted on others on behalf of her own agenda.

So let me say this now: Monica I am so sorry for any harm I caused you. I never ment to hurt anyone, and I think I did a nice job for you, but the fact remains that I took this without asking you and that was so very wrong. Please find it in you heart to forgive me. I sent the check to the University and also, because so many people really need help, serious help, I am sending one to Food bank of Western Massachusetts (sorry, I got the name wrong the first time, even tho we did write an article on them).

This is how it happened:
When putting together a magazine, a publishing firm usually has a staff of many, a stable of writers and proofreaders. Cooks Source doesnt, it is just us two...and believe me we would if we could use more help. Consequently I do much, have a few stalwart writers who love to write (for free) and a number of publishers and book agents who send me A LOT of books, recipes, press releases, etc -- I recieved one even today. In the past I have also assisted budding writers with their writing skills and given them a portfolio piece they can get jobs with, from magazines and newspapers that will pay them. In short, we do a lot of good, sell a lot of books for authors, and help a lot of people.
But one night when working yet another 12 hour day late into the night, I was short one article... Instead of picking up one of the multitude of books sent to me and typing it, I got lazy and went to the www and "found" something. Bleary-eyed I didnt notice it was copy written and reordered some of it. I did keep the author's name on it rather than outright "stealing" it, and it was my intention to contact the author, but I simply forgot, between proofreading, deliveries, exhaustion.

Cooks Source for those of you who are not familiar with it, works with small food-oriented businesses and farms to get the word out on their works/products. We are about getting readers to get up and go to some of these places, because they are so great and so much fun. We write every month on over 20 + businesses and feature a town a month and all their good food and interesting shops. We cover 16 towns and villages in Western New England, every month.

The bad news is that this is probably the final straw for Cooks Source. We have never been a great money-maker even with all the good we do for businesses. Having a black mark wont help...and now, our black mark will become our shroud. Winters are bleak in Western New England, and as such they are bleak for Cooks Source as well. This will end us. In the end if we did keep going, I would (very gladly) hire someone else to serve as editor and just continue my work with the towns. You should know that I did have an interview last week and the reporter grilled me seriously. I was able to show him all the promo books and articles we receive, all the photos we take and the "clip art" that is free for everyone. I also showed him those emails...

Thank you to all our readers, thanks to all our advertisers and writers... and to everyone who has been supportive and who has been a part of Cooks Source. To one writer in particular, Monica Gaudio, I wish you had given me a chance.

FIN


Frankly, this is the last proof anyone needed that Judith Griggs — presumably the author of this missive, since she refers solely to her dealings with illadore — is not right in the head, that she does not understand copyright, does not understand that what she was doing was criminal, does not understand that the right response to being caught in a criminal act is not to taunt the victim, does not understand that it is not the victim's responsibility to be endlessly patient while trying to explain criminal activity, does not understand WHY THE WORLD IS MAD AT HER… and certainly does not understand that the prospect of a serial thief whining that her stolen-goods business is going under is not appealing, and will not bring people over to her side. It's aggravating in the same way it's aggravating to see a small child sulking when you stop him from throwing food at the walls to see it splatter: Griggs apparently just does not understand what the problem is, or why everyone is being so mean to her. Part of me wants to sit her down and gently, slowly try to explain it to her. No one likes being bullied, and she is unquestionably being bullied; in a way, her response isn't that surprising.

But if she actually did want to keep her publication in business, this is about as far from the right response as it is possible to get.

(Not to mention if she really wanted people to believe that she "improved" illadore's article through editing. The statement currently on the site is not measured, sensible, or, well, at all edited.)

I'm-a feelin': confused baffled

Comments
madresal From: madresal Date: November 16th, 2010 08:51 pm (UTC) (Link)
The sheer cluelessness is amazing.

mckenzee From: mckenzee Date: November 16th, 2010 08:55 pm (UTC) (Link)
Bleary-eyed I didnt notice it was copy written and reordered some of it.

She doesn't understand copyright; she can't even spell it!
toratigris From: toratigris Date: November 16th, 2010 10:18 pm (UTC) (Link)
Actually, it's not a spelling error, and I think the error is, in a way, rather revealing.

She has confused two homophones, "write" and "right". "Copyright" is about the rights of the author (or other copyright holder), "copy write" is...well, writing copy. It seems as though she truly does not understand that she has been violating the rights of others, and that is precisely the problem, and it's...amusing...that her word-choice error reflects this same lack of understanding about "right" vs. "write".
ivy03 From: ivy03 Date: November 17th, 2010 05:46 pm (UTC) (Link)
Seems pretty clear that she doesn't realize that everything is copyrighted, unless old enough to be public domain or the creator has specifically given up their rights. It's not like trademarks or patents. Yeesh.
starfishchick From: starfishchick Date: November 16th, 2010 08:55 pm (UTC) (Link)
Instead of picking up one of the multitude of books sent to me and typing it, I got lazy and went to the www and "found" something. Bleary-eyed I didnt notice it was copy written and reordered some of it. I did keep the author's name on it rather than outright "stealing" it, and it was my intention to contact the author, but I simply forgot, between proofreading, deliveries, exhaustion.

Wow.
From: (Anonymous) Date: December 3rd, 2010 02:40 am (UTC) (Link)
Ugh. Because of course, if it was in a cookbook sent to her then copyright didn't apply and she could happily type it out....
akitrom From: akitrom Date: November 16th, 2010 08:56 pm (UTC) (Link)
For the record: she had several "chances". She refused to answer the first couple, and her viral snarky comment was how she chose to use her third chance. She's whining about not getting a fourth chance.

Having said that, if this letter is factually accurate -- if Griggs did indeed immediately offer to pay Gaudio her requested donation, and if Gaudio did indeed forget to mention that -- then there's something else going on.

If not, then Griggs is a liar on top of everything else.
rollick From: rollick Date: November 17th, 2010 12:37 am (UTC) (Link)
Given the blatant truth-bending going on in every bit of her characterization of the situation so far, and the way illadore by contrast has been blunt and specific and clear about the details, I know who I believe.
magdalene1 From: magdalene1 Date: November 16th, 2010 09:14 pm (UTC) (Link)
She is a wealthy white lady of a certain age, rollick. Don't you know those people are never wrong?
aroraborealis From: aroraborealis Date: November 16th, 2010 09:21 pm (UTC) (Link)
In this one, this is my favorite part:

I sent the check to the University and also, because so many people really need help, serious help, I am sending one to Food bank of Western Massachusetts (sorry, I got the name wrong the first time, even tho we did write an article on them)

Sure, you haven't managed to do anything else right, so why bother knowing the name of a food bank you featured? I'm sure that's the food bank's fault, somehow.
farklebarkle From: farklebarkle Date: November 16th, 2010 09:31 pm (UTC) (Link)
They should thank her for suggesting a better name!
From: ext_324932 Date: November 17th, 2010 04:19 pm (UTC) (Link)

Are you going to pay Judith Griggs for ripping off her whole post?

;-)
rollick From: rollick Date: November 17th, 2010 08:07 pm (UTC) (Link)

Re: Are you going to pay Judith Griggs for ripping off her whole post?

If I edit it so the punctuation makes more sense and all the typos are gone, will she pay me?
truthpact From: truthpact Date: November 17th, 2010 06:25 pm (UTC) (Link)
Pretty sure it doesn't count as not giving someone a chance when all she did was complain on her LJ about a reply she received (there was your chance Griggs, way to blow it) and question the masses what to do next. As far as I know, writing in your LJ isn't the same as bringing legal action against someone, which she was well within her rights to do anyway.

Griggs just strikes me as one of those people who can't admit that they did wrong.
dbcooper From: dbcooper Date: November 17th, 2010 07:32 pm (UTC) (Link)
Oh, dear. I have to ask if her passive aggression is the cause or the result of her lack of understanding.
kayay From: kayay Date: November 18th, 2010 01:33 am (UTC) (Link)
The Cooks Source website is gone. Griggs did say she'd "leave her statement up a few more days before eliminating the Cooks Source website altogether" but I was hoping "a few days" wouldn't mean "two"... or has it been three?
16 people still haven't weakened / Isn't it a great life?