Home
entries friends calendar user info The Onion's A.V. Club Previous Previous Next Next
profile
Consistency is my hobgoblin
User: [info]rollick
Name: Consistency is my hobgoblin
calendar
Back August 2008
12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31
links
Not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be - Behold the linkseses
rollick
[info]rollick
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Behold the linkseses
Urgh. I hate it when I lie down "for just a few minutes" because I'm too tired to concentrate on work, and I wake up eight hours later, still partially clothed and with my mouth tasting like something crawled into it, died, and then laboriously crawled back out again. Guess it beats insomnia, but my mental clock still thinks it's yesterday, which is bad because I've got a lot of stuff to do today, including interviewing Dave McKean. I re-read his massive graphic novel Cages last night to prepare, and liked it better this time than the last time I read it, which I think was just after college. It made more sense this time. I'm still not a huge fan of his distorted line drawings, but I like his stories-inside-stories, particularly the one about the metaphorical bridge with two sons.

Random entertainments for a Friday morning:

Per Neil Gaiman's blog, a thoroughly entertaining photo-retouching portfolio, one of those mouse-over-the-image-and-see-what-these-people-really-look-like sites. I love these. I mean, on some level it's gratifying to know that none of the women on fashion-magazine covers are actually real, and they're all airbrushed and streamlined to hell. But mostly, the specific changes made to these photos amuse me. No matter how thin a woman is, apparently, she needs a tummy tuck. And rounder boobs. And shiny highlights on her skin, regardless of the lighting in the rest of the photo. But it's a coin-toss whether she needs more booty, or less. My favorite of these is the second from the right in the top row, where the retoucher went a little nuts with the breast-creating. Pity there aren't more retouched photos of men — the two included here don't seem to have gotten nearly as much bodywork, and I'm curious whether that's typical.

Per [info]shihtzu, it's more hilarious Revenge Of The Sith mistranslation theater! Some of the same screencaps, plus a whole lot more. And here's a transcript of one segment of the movie, with a comparison between the actual dialogue and the distorted translation. Two squares fight the vehemence. The improbity fills the world!

A bunch of my LJ Friends are getting all squiddly over the extended Doom trailer, which leaves me all meh. I mean, the obvious nods to FPS games are cute, but where are the monsters? If I'm gonna go see a movie that's all about gunning down huge waves of monsters, I want some indication in the trailer that there are huge waves of monsters, not just brief lunging shadows. I'm not going to Doom to watch The Rock tote around a big gun, I'm going to see beholders. The fact that the trailer's so stingy with its monsters — and what you do see looks like a rubber Ghostbusters terror dog — thrills me not.

Finally, this Cat & Girl comic about how the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up struck me as one of the cartoonist's more insightful recent observations. As usual, not much of a punchline, but the thoughts on our relationship with different media are interesting.

I'm a-hearin': "Prima Donna," "Phantom of the Opera" soundtrack

Comments
febrile From: [info]febrile Date: August 26th, 2005 02:35 pm (UTC) (Link)
I, too, adore the "See me before retouching!" peek-a-boos. But what does it say when I like some of the originals better than the retouches?
rollick From: [info]rollick Date: August 26th, 2005 02:42 pm (UTC) (Link)
That you like people better than plastic mockups of people?
febrile From: [info]febrile Date: August 26th, 2005 02:51 pm (UTC) (Link)
Naah, that can't be it.
niemandsrose From: [info]niemandsrose Date: August 26th, 2005 03:02 pm (UTC) (Link)
Means you'd rather touch than retouch.
mandy_moon From: [info]mandy_moon Date: August 26th, 2005 02:40 pm (UTC) (Link)
Neil Gaiman has a blog?

Where?
rollick From: [info]rollick Date: August 26th, 2005 02:44 pm (UTC) (Link)
Oh, heck yes. He's pretty prolific on it, too. We talked about it when I interviewed him — apparently he's got a million and a half readers at this point. You can pick up the LJ feed here, or get it directly from his website.
mandy_moon From: [info]mandy_moon Date: August 26th, 2005 02:54 pm (UTC) (Link)
Wow, thanks.

I'm a big fan.
malinaldarose From: [info]malinaldarose Date: August 26th, 2005 03:05 pm (UTC) (Link)
The one I found most interesting was the one with the two women with a laptop in front of a mirror, because they rotated the women, but don't seem to have rotated the reflection to match.
diotina From: [info]diotina Date: August 26th, 2005 03:10 pm (UTC) (Link)
I finally got to see Mirrormask - so much more McKean's film than Gaiman's, dontcha think? I do like Gaiman's work, but I did think the artwork and the way the film looked was so much better than the storyline - which I think was basically rescued by Stephanie Leonidas' wonderful performance. McKean was there at the viewing too - he's so lovely and approachable and er...cuddly. I even got to ask him a question, which was nice. :)
rollick From: [info]rollick Date: August 26th, 2005 03:23 pm (UTC) (Link)
Hooray for interviews with the directors after screenings!

Yeah, far more Dave's project than Neil's — and Neil's been very emphatic about that in interviews.
From: stealthmunchkin Date: August 26th, 2005 03:13 pm (UTC) (Link)
Just thought that you might be interested that Dave Sim's Collected Letters 2004 came out yesterday, and is every bit as batshit-crazy, infuriating, funny and fascinating as you'd imagine. In particular, his letters to you are there, along with a couple of references in other letters to 'the chick from The Onion' and how he's certain you're going to do a hatchet job on him...
rollick From: [info]rollick Date: August 26th, 2005 03:22 pm (UTC) (Link)
AWESOME. Now I'm going to have to try and find a copy… Don't suppose there's any later reaction, from after the piece came out? I'm curious whether he considered what we ended up doing a hatchet job, even though he got to preview every line of it, and it was all verbatim.